in

Criteria about third party sensors

Last post 07-23-2008 12:02 PM by Dave Carlson. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-21-2008 8:43 PM

    • Andres
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-22-2008
    • Posts 1

    Criteria about third party sensors

    I'll give you a criteria according to my experience of working simultaneously with NRG and THIES sensors. I ran a wind prospecting network of over 80 masts of 50 m each, in Cuba, and I installed my self over 50 % of them. One thing that favoured your plastic cover anemometers against the THIES' anodized aluminum body is the lightnings. I had, 'till date, 5 anemometres that were literraly stocked by indirect lightning stroke, the bearing got virtually melted. This is something that naver happended with NRG anemos. But, I've notice that NRG anemos have a bigger inertia than THIES ones, at the moment of start running, like if the bearings of THIES had less friction, and this is something quite interesting, that I've found in a mast in which i installed both systems. 

  • 07-23-2008 12:02 PM In reply to

    Re: Criteria about third party sensors

     Andres, good information, thank you! 

    I just wanted to point out that while the Thies may have a slightly lower moment of inertia, the NRG MAX #40 will reach linearity by the time wind speed reaches 4 m/s.  Any speeds lower than this are of little concern with respect to wind energy, because there is essentially not enough energy in the wind for production. 

    All the best,
    Dave 

    NRG Tech Support
    Filed under:
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)